I’ve been waiting for the longest time for someone to use that word.
Last Sunday, presidential candidate Tan Kin Lian finally broke the ice with a blog post entitled “Watershed Presidential Election”.
Oh, how I’ve missed you since the end of the watershed General Elections in May.
Actually, Mr Tan’s post was referring to a Facebook post by someone else about “why this Presidential Election is the real watershed”.
Unfortunately, “watershed” hasn’t quite caught on this time round, even though with four candidates, compared to just one in the previous presidential election, this election certainly counts as a watershed.
Instead, the word that seems to be getting some traction is “historic”.
My Paper used it in a recent headline and presidential candidate Tan Jee Say in his Nomination Day speech.
But isn’t every election inherently “historic”?
And I’m not confusing it with the word “historical”.
Which reminds me of an old joke. This guy said to another guy: “Whenever my wife and I have a fight, she gets historical.”
The other guy said: “Don’t you mean hysterical?”
“No,” the first guy said, “I mean historical because she keeps bringing up the past.”
Anyway, where was I?
Oh yah, I think “watershed” is a better word because it suggests that a particular election is even more “historic” than other “historic” elections.
But I guess you can’t have two “watershed” elections in one year. Each has to have its own branding.
I’m rooting for “landmark” for the Presidential Election.
Since this is the most trenchant analysis of the election I can offer, is it any wonder that when people ask me who I’m going to vote for, my answer is whoever my wife tells me to?
This has been true for every election since 1993.
We resolved to vote as a bloc of two to avoid cancelling out each other’s votes. Otherwise, we might as well just stay home and do the laundry.
I let her decide which party or candidate to vote for and in exchange, she lets me select the curtains for our home.
I believe I got the better end of the deal.
My wife is also more qualified to pick the president because two Fridays ago, she happened to meet two of the presidential wannabes separately at the Red Dot Museum on Maxwell Road where she was selling her handmade bags.
She was surprised by the limp handshake she got from one candidate but was impressed by the “powerful” handshake of the other, although she complained, “He’s so short!”
Maybe next time, the Goverment could add a height requirement in the Constitution. That would be hysterical.
It would also be a historic watershed.
No, wait, I mean landmark.
Despite all the efforts the Government has made to clarify the role of the President, the debate festers.
Checks and balances? Multiracialism? ISA? Moving out of the Istana? High five!
Meh. All the candidates really need to get right during their walkabouts is their handshake.
At least to impress my wife.
I mean they can’t do anything about their shortness, can they?
Did I mention I loooooove our curtains?
- Published in The New Paper, 21 August 2011
UPDATE: The candidate with the "limp" handshake won the election.
TRENDING POSTS OF THE WEEK
Thanks to recent taken-out-of-context comments by a former Prime Minister who shall remain unnamed, ministers' pay has been a hot topic...
It started with this Cyberpioneer Facebook post: What does Military Expert (ME) 1 Clarie Teo enjoy, when she is not busy keeping ship eng...
It has been a year since Clarie Teo left the navy with this Instagram post: The day has finally arrived, not everyone is meant to set fo...
Do you have enough of Navy chio bu ME1 Clarie Teo? Posted by Must Be Singapore on Tuesday, April 7, 2015 Meet the star of Mindef's ne...
I first met Darryl David at Gurmit Singh's wedding dinner in 1995. David's date was a woman named Lynette Pang , who was a stag...
When I learnt that Vernetta Lopez ’s autobiography Memoirs Of A DJ: Life In Progress was published last week, I rushed to the nearest major...
Lately, I've been noticing the recurring use of an unfamiliar word on social media. Aisey. Posted by SMRT Ltd (Feedback) on Wedne...
It’s like 1996 all over again. Only instead of the Macarena , we’re dancing Gangnam Style . Instead of watching the White House get bl...
This month is the 28th anniversary of the publication of my one and only letter to the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) monthly magazine, Pion...
Okay, I surrender. I admit it. I was wrong. In April last year, I wrote a column called “ So is Joanne Peh really going out with Qi Yuwu? ...